SanDisk Ultra® microSDXC ¢ UHS-I Card, 512GB, 150MB/s R, 10 Y Warranty, for Smartphones
Original price was: ₹7,200.00.₹3,699.00Current price is: ₹3,699.00.
- SanDisk Ultra 512GB microSDXC UHS-I , 150MB/s R memory card, 10 Y Warranty, for Smartphones
,
Specification: SanDisk Ultra® microSDXC ¢ UHS-I Card, 512GB, 150MB/s R, 10 Y Warranty, for Smartphones
|
13 reviews for SanDisk Ultra® microSDXC ¢ UHS-I Card, 512GB, 150MB/s R, 10 Y Warranty, for Smartphones
Add a review
Original price was: ₹7,200.00.₹3,699.00Current price is: ₹3,699.00.
Timothy Skinner –
I check every storage device with H2Testw when I receive them. This particular card tested as 512Gb with no errors. This means that the advertised capacity is correct and the card is likely genuine. Read and write speed were reasonable for this class of card.
vedant agarwal –
the transfer speed on this is good i am using this on my tab s8 plus and never faced a problem until i used 380 gb of the product the sd card started lagging a little after that point
Callum Nicholls –
Also my card had some decent read wright performance.
KrishangGupta –
1. Slow write speed.
2. Read speed is good.
3. Google why you get only 470-480gb and not 512gb. Its not a scam
4. Doesnt get currupted if you eject it everytime before removing it. Without the eject command, data loss is very much sure.
5. Read speed is good.
6. Storage is good.
Omkar –
It don’t gives 512GB
It gives 477GB total space
Go for it.
E –
I couldn’t fault anything, ordered the night before 7pm and arrived on next morning.
Frankie Fernandes –
Good as expected.
Bob Nim –
I use it for my Nintendo Switch. Works well, doesn’t appear to lag or stutter for any games yet. Definitely recommended, especially if you are able to purchase it below RRP
Amzn Customer 01 –
Good
anurag sindal –
Nice
Anonymous –
Used for storing music files in an old Samsung tablet I am using as a HD music player. Works perfectly.
Abhimanyu Nayak –
Although the writting speed is not as advertised but it’s not bad either
SK –
Major drawback is slow transfer speed not upto the mark as they described